Test drive Mitsubishi ASX 2020 - part 4
Against the background of a 2-liter 150-horsepower engine, it seems the 1.6-liter version will be a loser: after all, 33 hp. and 43 Nm difference. But no - surprisingly, the 1.6 liter engine "suffices" when driving around the city and on the highway about "hundreds". After all, this version of the Mitsubishi ASX 2020 is noticeably lighter (160 kg), plus a traditional 5-speed motor is paired with a motor. Manual transmission and front-wheel drive: less transmission losses. As a result, we have a linear relationship between pressing the accelerator pedal and real acceleration: pressed - received. And also due to its lightness, the car seems more agile and agile, it is easy to drive it on tight city streets, the crossover is quickly rearranged in rows.
Although the engine is noisy: starting quietly, when it reaches 3.5-4 thousand rpm, the engine breaks into the cabin with a noticeable rumble. True, to the credit of the motor, accompanying all this with a tide, albeit a small, but noticeable wave of additional acceleration and dynamics. The familiar "mechanics" offers a good selection of gear ratios (perhaps only 5 would like to be more "stretched"), as well as light and precise shifting, even despite the long lever. There is only one global comment to the transmission - the clutch pedal with a long travel and an incomprehensible moment of operation.
The 1.6-liter version can offer energy-intensive suspension and short overhangs (195 mm clearance): enough for rough city roads and rural dirt roads, but nothing more. But what surprises us is the "sufficiency" of the motor: thanks to the successful selection of gear ratios of the "mechanics" (wow, and a long lever!) And overall lightness: 1290 kg, which is 160 kg lighter than a 2-liter car with all-wheel drive. And another 1.6-liter is pleased with the consumption: in the city it is possible to consistently bring 8 liters per 100 km, and with empty roads and smooth driving - even 7-7.5 liters per 100 km, in traffic jams it still receives no more than 9-10 l per 100 km.
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий